Next.js is one of the most talked-about frameworks in the JavaScript world. It promises better performance, SEO benefits, and server-side rendering. But is it really the best choice for everyone?
In this article, we’ll explore why Next.js might not be the right choice for you. If you’re a beginner, working on small projects, or considering long-term scalability, you might want to reconsider. Let’s break it down.
1. Steep Learning Curve for Beginners
If you’re new to React, jumping straight into Next.js can be overwhelming. Next.js introduces concepts like:
- Server-side rendering (SSR)
- Static site generation (SSG)
- API routes
- Middleware and edge functions
Understanding these topics requires a solid foundation in React first. If you struggle with React, adding Next.js to your learning path may slow you down.
Alternative?
Start with React.js first, then explore Next.js when you feel comfortable with React’s fundamentals.
2. Increased Complexity for Small Projects
If you’re building a small website or a portfolio, Next.js might be overkill. It introduces additional setup and complexity that you don’t necessarily need.
For instance, a simple React project can be deployed using Vite or Create React App, making development faster and easier.
Alternative?
If you don’t need server-side rendering, stick with React + Vite for a faster and simpler setup.
3. Hosting and Deployment Challenges
Unlike React apps that can be hosted on any static hosting provider like Netlify or GitHub Pages, Next.js apps require a server environment for SSR or API routes.
- Hosting on Vercel (the company behind Next.js) is easy but comes with limitations.
- If you want custom hosting, setting up a server for Next.js SSR can be complex and expensive.
Alternative?
If you need simple hosting, consider React + Firebase Hosting or Gatsby for static sites.
4. Limited Flexibility With Backend Choices
Next.js has built-in API routes, but they aren’t as powerful as a full-fledged backend. If you plan on using Node.js with Express, you might find Next.js limiting.
- Serverless functions in Next.js are great for small APIs but lack the flexibility of a dedicated backend framework like Express.js or NestJS.
- Managing large-scale applications with complex APIs can be challenging.
Alternative?
Use a standalone backend with Node.js + Express or go for a Headless CMS.
5. SEO is Not Exclusive to Next.js
One of Next.js’s biggest selling points is SEO optimization. However, you don’t need Next.js for good SEO. Other frameworks offer great SEO capabilities too.
- Gatsby is a static site generator with built-in SEO.
- React apps with SSR frameworks like Remix can also handle SEO well.
- Vanilla React with dynamic meta tags and proper optimization can rank just as well.
Alternative?
If SEO is your main concern, explore Gatsby or Remix instead of Next.js.
6. Performance Overhead in Some Cases
Next.js is optimized for performance, but that doesn’t mean it’s the fastest option for every project.
- For fully static websites, using Next.js can add unnecessary overhead compared to a pure static site.
- For real-time apps, Next.js SSR may slow things down compared to a WebSocket-powered backend.
Alternative?
If performance is your concern, choose a framework based on your use case:
- Static sites? Use Gatsby or Hugo.
- Real-time apps? Use Express.js + WebSockets.
7. Tied to the Vercel Ecosystem
While Next.js can be hosted anywhere, it works best with Vercel. This can be seen as a lock-in strategy. If you plan to use AWS, DigitalOcean, or Firebase, Next.js requires additional configuration.
Alternative?
Choose a framework that offers more deployment flexibility, like Nuxt.js (for Vue) or Remix.
Final Thoughts: Should You Learn Next.js?
Next.js is not a bad framework—it’s just not the best choice for everyone. If you’re building an SEO-heavy website with SSR, Next.js is great. However, if you’re working on small projects, need a flexible backend, or prefer simpler hosting, you should consider other options.
When NOT to Use Next.js:
❌ If you’re a beginner still learning React. ❌ If you’re building small projects or portfolios. ❌ If you need flexible backend architecture. ❌ If you want easier hosting options. ❌ If you don’t need server-side rendering.
If you’re looking for alternatives, React, Gatsby, and Remix are great options, depending on your needs.
What’s Next?
If you’re still unsure, start with React.js and explore other frameworks once you have a strong foundation.
For more detailed guides on frameworks, visit BeemyTech!
Do you still think Next.js is worth learning? Let us know in the comments!
